The trade court noted that Trump retains more limited power to impose tariffs to address trade deficits under another statute, the Trade Act of 1974. But that law restricts tariffs to 15% and only for 150 days with countries with which the United States runs big trade deficits.

A legal battle over tariffs threatens Donald Trump's control over his favoured economic weapon. On Thursday evening, the President of the United States once again criticised lower court judges who ruled against him,

President Trump claims tariffs will make the U.S. rich. A coalition of states and small businesses argued the opposite in court and dealt a blow to his trade war.

That was the question in front of the federal courts that ruled against President Trump’s tariffs in the last couple days. The judges weren’t deciding whether the tariffs are good for the country but whether the president has the power to impose them all by himself.

A little-known three-judge panel’s ruling against President Donald Trump’s tariffs could have presented an easy off-ramp for him to call it quits on an economic policy unpopular with the public and worrisome for GOP lawmakers.

I thought we were right, but I know that’s not always the way the world works.” Schwartz, a small wine importer and distributor, is the lead plaintiff in a lawsuit that was filed in April by the Liberty Justice Center,

The Trump administration deals with legal setbacks as a U.S. trade court blocks sweeping tariffs. Despite initial optimism in financial markets, uncertainty lingers over the tariffs' future, costing businesses $34 billion.

Trump's administration faced multiple legal setbacks on Wednesday, as three federal court rulings blocked elements of his immigration and trade policies.