GSK has agreed to pay up to $2.2 billion to settle most lawsuits in US state courts claiming that a discontinued version of the heartburn drug Zantac caused cancer, the company announced on Wednesday.

May 2 (Reuters) - U.S. attorneys for a woman who claims her colon cancer was caused by the now discontinued heartburn drug Zantac on Thursday told a jury in Chicago that pharmaceutical companies GSK ...

Delaware—the first of the 13 colonies to ratify the U.S. Constitution—also prides itself on being the state of incorporation for "more than 66% of the Fortune 500." The Delaware Supreme Court recently ...

Pfizer has agreed to settle more than 10,000 lawsuits which alleged that the company failed to warn patients about possible cancer risks caused by the anti-heartburn medication Zantac. The lawsuits ...

Why are we asking for donations? Why are we asking for donations? This site is free thanks to our community of supporters. Voluntary donations from readers like you keep our news accessible for ...

The Delaware Supreme Court has overturned a lower court’s decision that allowed expert testimony supporting plaintiffs’ claims in a high-profile case alleging that Zantac, or its generic ranitidine, ...

Defendants in Delaware's Zantac litigation have asked the state Supreme Court to review a Superior Court ruling that allowed testimony from plaintiffs' experts, by claiming that the decision placed ...

GSK GSK0.37%increase; green up pointing triangle agreed to pay more than $2 billion to settle almost all remaining liability cases in the U.S. over allegations its discontinued heartburn medicine ...

The companies, which all sold Zantac at different times, argue that Medinilla should have granted their motion to block plaintiffs from presenting expert testimony that Zantac causes cancer. That ...

Sanofi Consumer Healthcare is pushing back on a recommendation that it discontinue the “#1 doctor-recommended” claim for its Zantac 360° heartburn medicine in a case brought by competitor Johnson & ...

In this supplemental § 1925(a) opinion, the court identified new facts, namely that his wife was no longer affiliated with the law firm of Reed Smith, which represented one of the defendants in the ...